In three
parts to this new book Melvin Tinker covers well the tension that exists in many
churches over the relationship between and priority of evangelism and social
action. In Part 1 he reviews the different stances taken by evangelicals and
offers some critique. In Part 2 he lays the exegetical groundwork to model the
relationship between evangelism and social action. In Part 3 he details what
this looks like in his ministry at St John Newland.
One
strength of the book is the clear and methodical way he documents the tension
historically and the way more recent church leaders (Tim Keller, John Stott,
Michael Hill, Tim Chester, D. A. Carson) have attempted to express and resolve
the tension. Although the setting for the discussion is clearly Great Britain,
there is much that is true here is America as well. It is a book of substance
addressing a contemporary issue with a long and familiar history.
The most
helpful part of the book for me are Chapters 6 and 7 where the parallels
between Isaiah 61 and the Sermon on the Mount are discussed as Tinker unpacks
the pictures Jesus uses of his followers being like ‘salt’, ‘light’ and a ‘city
on a hill’. Here he concludes that the co-ordination of evangelism and social
action is modelled by the Sermon on the Mount and shaped by the motifs behind Isaiah
59-61. First there is the heralding of
the good news from the new city on the hill. Second, since being the ‘salt of
the earth’ is a symbolic reference to maintaining the covenant, we are to
engage in a prophetic ministry in all our social relations to be sure that the
integrity of the covenant remains operative. We are to preach justice and all
those attributes characteristic of God and his designs for our living. Thirdly,
we are to be light – shining examples expressing the new life that we have
found in the Kingdom.
The last
chapter is a very practical chapter where Tinker gives concrete examples how he
manages to keep the proper biblical character to his practice of evangelism and
social action.
One point
of frustration with the book is the failure to define what Tinker means by ‘The
Reforming Evangelicals” and the “Radical Evangelicals” in chapter 3. I suppose
those are well understood terms in the U.K., but not for this American reader.
I
received this resource for free from EP Books via Cross Focused Reviews for
this review. I was not required to write a positive review.
No comments:
Post a Comment